Warning: include_once(/home/tedski/rumromanismrebellion.net/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-support/wordpress-support.php): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/tedski/rumromanismrebellion.net/wp-settings.php on line 261
Warning: include_once(): Failed opening '/home/tedski/rumromanismrebellion.net/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-support/wordpress-support.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/lib/php:/usr/local/php5/lib/pear') in /home/tedski/rumromanismrebellion.net/wp-settings.php on line 261 Paul Ryan | Rum, Romanism and Rebellion
Even the people that sent out the mailer acknowledge that they don’t mean the actual Paul Ryan budget, but only in the fine print.
Since it was not the Ryan Budget, many of the cuts decried in the piece (Medicare, Food Stamps) were not actually cut in the plan.
Don’t get me wrong, I wasn’t a fan of this deal when it was made (although, predictably, my troubles are from the left). I also know it is far better than the Ryan Budget. As a matter of fact, the criticisms in the piece are spot on about the Ryan Budget. Say, what kind of “scary” candidate supports the Ryan Budget?
Maybe this group that wanted to call out candidates for supporting the Ryan Budget will come on out and run a piece decrying her for being so scary. Say, who sent out this piece anyhow?
I would welcome their opposition to Paul Ryan, but something tells me they aren’t very sincere about it.
POST SCRIPTS: I’ve got a couple of extra observations to throw in here.
Have you noticed how Republican candidates are quick to align themselves with the Ryan Budget, but cry foul when they get called out for supporting the details of the plan? It’s like they haven’t read the thing.
The mailer apparently went to Democratic voters. Independent voters are on a different mail program. This is a last ditch effort to peel liberal voters away from Barber. Given how poorly Matt Heinz did as the lefty challenger to Barber last time, I think more liberal voters have already resigned themselves to Barber’s pragmatism.
Oh, by the way: Ron Barber is a Trotskyite overspending Obama coddler and he supports this horrible, granny murdering, poor bashing budget? Could you guys pick a knock against the guy and stick with it?
I received this along with two mailers from my local Republican legislative candidate after I’ve already voted. Keep spending that money, boys.
Chief among the attacks from Ron Barber against Jesse Kelly were quotes from Kelly’s last campaign regarding Social Security and Medicare. Kelly claimed that the attacks were unfair, but refused to explain his alleged change of heart.
Unfair or no (I say “no”), it was clear that Kelly wanted to campaign as the defender of Social Security and Medicare, if the yellow police-tape like decorations on his signs were to be believed.
The thing that struck me about this was how many of the Republican budget ideas out there revolve around big changes, eviscerations really, to both programs. If these are such fantastic ideas, why not campaign on them? Especially in a Republican district like the one Kelly was running in.
Barack Obama is deeply unpopular in West Virginia, and the congressman in question is not in a particularly tough race. This is not a guy that needs to “moderate” or “reach out.” It seems to be exactly the sort of campaign where a candidate can proudly say he’s for everything the caucus is pushing for.
If these ideas are so fantastic and are what the American people asked for, why can’t they get their candidates to campaign on them?
The blog Arizona’s Politics did a good job of summing up the rebuttal to the ridiculous attack that Ron Barber is looking to destroy Medicare.
Well, as we’ve learned, actual facts will not get in the way of this hit. Give it a couple of weeks, they’ll be droning on about Barber personally running a death panel.
The funny part is that Jesse Kelly, along with every Republican running for anything, is a supporter of the Paul Ryan budget plan. The Ryan plan would shift more of the costs of health care to beneficiaries. That isn’t some claim of a lefty blogger, it’s what the Congressional Budget Office says:
Under the proposal, most elderly people would pay more for their health care than they would pay under the current Medicare system.
If Kelly and his supporters want to take down Medicare, fine, let them argue the merits. But falsely accusing your opponent of doing so when you support a policy that does that? Any names for that?
We may have just learned Barber’s campaign plans today, but we’ve already known his political agenda for weeks. Barber is supported by Arizona boycotter Raul Grijalva and has said he would have rubber stamped all of President Obama’s policies over the last three years, including Obamacare’s $500 billion cut to Medicare. That’s the wrong direction for Southern Arizona, and voters will have a clear choice in this election.
“We’ve already known his political agenda for weeks,” sounds so nefarious. With so much lead time, they could have been a bit more creative.
We’ve got a couple of entertaining claims here. First off is the connection to Grijalva and the boycott, which is laughable given how Giffords’s political operation actively attacked Grijalva for the boycott.
The second is the claim about Medicare. Let’s trot out this gem again. I don’t know where they get the $500 billion number, and it will change for the next time some Republican will need to use it anyway. The claim is based on some changes in the Affordable Care Act regarding the way providers were compensated, and the money saved was plowed back into the Part D program for some low income beneficiaries. This claim has been shot down in the past, but they keep going with it. I guess we should admire their stubbornness.
The silliest part about the continued attacks on this front is how many of the Republicans making it support so-called “reform plans” like the ones that Paul Ryan has been pushing and is pushing again that would eviscerate medicare far more than even their wildest claims about Democratic plans.
I guess we can expect the NRCC and its “Young Gun” candidates (sorry Frank!) to come out against the Ryan plan.
Or at least the local press can ask them about it when they, you know, run ads talking about how much they are into protecting seniors.