Skip to content

If I was in the legislature…

I know it’s already been passed by both houses, but here is my suggested amendment to SB 1062. I think all right thinking people will find it an improvement:

A. A person exercising rights under this section must post a sign that clearly prohibits certain persons on their premises. The sign shall conform to the following requirements:
1. Be posted in a conspicuous location accessible to the general public.
2. Contain a pictogram that details what persons are not allowed within a red circle and a diagonal red line across a representation of such persons.
3. Contain the words, “no (description of persons not allowed) allowed pursuant to state law”.
B. A so-described person shall not be on the premises of a retailer if the owner has posted the notice prescribed in subsection A of this section.
C. It is an affirmative defense to a violation of subsection B of this section if:
1. The person was not informed of the notice prescribed in subsection A of this section before the violation.
2. Any one or more of the following apply:
(a) At the time of the violation the notice prescribed in subsection A of this section had fallen down.
(b) At the time of the violation the person was not a resident of this state.
(c) The retailer had posted the notice prescribed in subsection A of this section not more than thirty days before the violation.
D. An appropriate state agency shall prepare signs at no cost to retailers.
E. The signs required by this section shall be composed of block, capital letters printed in black on white laminated paper at a minimum weight of one hundred ten pound index. The lettering and pictogram shall consume a space at least six inches by nine inches. The letters comprising the words “no (description of persons not) allowed” shall be at least three-fourths of a vertical inch and all other letters shall be at least one-half of a vertical inch. Nothing shall prohibit a retailer from posting additional signs at one or more locations on the premises.

-RRR-

Rule #1 of satire is that you never rip off the mask. You let your readers poke around and figure things out for themselves. Jonathan Swift didn’t have an an epilogue to A Modest Proposal saying “Hey, I was kidding about that…” Still, I want to explain a bit of what I did here. What I have above is ARS 4-229, the law that says that bar owners who don’t want guns in their establishments must post a sign. When the law was debated, there was a suggestion for even a larger sign. Then-Senator Randy Graf suggested a sign that would have been about half the size of the front door of most bars. Firearms are so protected and important that everyone has to know what place won’t welcome them.

No such provision is in SB 1062. Our guns are important to us; our gay neighbors aren’t.

11 Comments

  1. replica bags wrote:

    Rum, Romanism and Rebellion › If I was in the legislature… replica bags

    Thursday, February 27, 2014 at 9:10 am | Permalink
  2. OH I’ll see if I can think of something for FromAFriendFriday!
    http://keep.com/asics-womens-gel-noosa-tri-8-running-shoe-by-eser/k/m72sSNABLG/ http://keep.com/asics-womens-gel-noosa-tri-8-running-shoe-by-eser/k/m72sSNABLG/

    Friday, February 28, 2014 at 8:28 pm | Permalink
  3. In general, poverty and lack of education are far more significant factors in high fertility rates than religion. So the real root of environmental problems is not population, but poverty and injustice. Remember, too, that people’s impact on the environment can be more serious than numbers would show.

    Friday, February 28, 2014 at 11:41 pm | Permalink
  4. wkrlnljkqo wrote:

    Rum, Romanism and Rebellion › If I was in the legislature…
    wkrlnljkqo http://www.g44w1fjl7l21yw809r8z95o0qvd1gy78s.org/
    [url=http://www.g44w1fjl7l21yw809r8z95o0qvd1gy78s.org/]uwkrlnljkqo[/url]
    awkrlnljkqo

    Friday, February 28, 2014 at 11:43 pm | Permalink
  5. xsctrpkgyn wrote:

    Rum, Romanism and Rebellion › If I was in the legislature…
    axsctrpkgyn
    [url=http://www.gf7p01u6h0s27d89q8c1ll6f7q61mdb5s.org/]uxsctrpkgyn[/url]
    xsctrpkgyn http://www.gf7p01u6h0s27d89q8c1ll6f7q61mdb5s.org/

    Friday, February 28, 2014 at 11:43 pm | Permalink
  6. my input wrote:

    Depending on the answers, you are going to learn from a coach what you should do next. It can be a task that most of the students can find rational excuse of not performing it.

    Monday, March 3, 2014 at 6:59 am | Permalink
  7. consistently winning is the way to get there,” she said in an email
    Cheap Nike Air Jordan shoes

    Monday, March 3, 2014 at 10:43 am | Permalink
  8. In contrast – Substantial Specifics of north park moving firm

    Monday, March 3, 2014 at 4:11 pm | Permalink
  9. There sneakers are incredibly lightweight, durable, cozy and offer the appropriate support. You will discover numerous unique cross trainers from Nike so there are solutions for guys. It is normally superior to go with the most effective they have offered out now. We seriously love this sneaker from Ryka. It is actually particularly cozy, has the flexibility that is definitely necessary, as well as support.
    Nike Shox Women

    Monday, March 3, 2014 at 11:09 pm | Permalink
  10. I have been absent for a while, but now I remember why I used to love this website. Thank you, I will try and check back more often. How frequently you update your website?

    Tuesday, March 4, 2014 at 2:24 am | Permalink
  11. Awesome Uncomplicated Work from Home Concepts

    Tuesday, March 4, 2014 at 9:36 am | Permalink