I wonder how enamored people are going to be with this “jungle primary” idea when their first general election presents two candidates from the same political party.
-

Search
-
RSS Links
Contents
Et Al
-
Recent Comments
- Beware of Democrats Cutting Unproductive Deals (4)
- theseheadphonesbeats: – these headphones beats solo hd are no… – Real...
- april1'sBlogs-Female: Rum, Romanism and Rebellion › Beware of Democrats Cutting...
- incrediblesatisfacti: Rum, Romanism and Rebellion › Beware of Democrats Cutting...
- ChristianLouboutinla: Rum, Romanism and Rebellion › Beware of Democrats Cutting...
- Recommended Reading: Celebrating a Failure of Regime Change and Nation Building (2)
- The un-Ted: Truly fascinating. Thank you for the summary and thanks to Hayes-Batista...
- Beware of Democrats Cutting Unproductive Deals (4)
-

Blogroll
- A Pithy Diarist
- Arizona Eagletarian
- Blog for Arizona
- Carolyn's Community
- Deep Thought
- Democratic Diva
- District 26 Democrats
- District 30 Democrats
- Espresso Pundit
- Liberal Desert
- Poco Bravo
- Politico Mafioso
- Sonoran Alliance
- Sustainability, Equity and Development
- Talking Points Memo
- The Range
- Tucson Choices
- Wonkette
- Working Life
5 Comments
California has this?
Yes, Joni, and Tedski’s scenario has just that problem 5 Democrats and 2 Republicans ran for office, the dems split up the vote and now the 2 republicans are running against each other in the general. In a Dem district.
In the 2010 AG race Andrew Thomas and Tom Horne both got more votes than any of the Democrats. So theoretically in a jungle primary the general election could have been Thomas against Horne. On the other hand, how many Republicans were there that were completely sickened by the Horne-Thomas primary and would have voted for Democrat Rotellini? So it’s very difficult to predict how any particular race will play out. It is clear, however, that having the party coalesce behind a single candidate will be a big advantage in such a scenario.
I don’t think many people will like it, but will wait until it passes and gets put into use before figuring that out.
Much better alternative is Ranked Choice, aka Instant Runoff. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting
and
http://www.sfelections.org/demo/english/index.html
Dearest Commenters,
I am not sure what end this will come to, but if it takes power away from the parties and gives more power to the independent voters who despise them… well, it can’t be all bad.
Your Humble Servant,
Christopher