Comments on: Where Arizona Money Is Going http://www.rumromanismrebellion.net/2007/04/18/where-arizona-money-is-going/ "We beg no longer; we entreat no more; we petition no more. We defy them!" - William Jennings Bryan Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:57:55 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Appleblossom http://www.rumromanismrebellion.net/2007/04/18/where-arizona-money-is-going/comment-page-1/#comment-5818 Appleblossom Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:18:40 +0000 http://www.rumromanismrebellion.net/2007/04/18/where-arizona-money-is-going/#comment-5818 This was a well researched and thought out post. And yet people still wonder why you are biased. Could not be because you do a better job then many media pundits? hmmm...naaaaaaaah. This was a well researched and thought out post. And yet people still wonder why you are biased. Could not be because you do a better job then many media pundits?

hmmm…naaaaaaaah.

]]> By: kralmajales http://www.rumromanismrebellion.net/2007/04/18/where-arizona-money-is-going/comment-page-1/#comment-5815 kralmajales Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:18:43 +0000 http://www.rumromanismrebellion.net/2007/04/18/where-arizona-money-is-going/#comment-5815 Great story Ted. This is shaping up to what could be a really interesting primary race. The big question for me is whether Clinton has lined up support within typical Democratic primary leaders and, thereby, voters in these states? Does she have the party's so called "Super Delegates" if those still exist at the convention? Is her support "soft"? In the past I have been excited by fresh new candidates like an Obama, a Richardson, or an Edwards (not all that new...but no Clinton in terms of ties) only to see them get run over by a train built of established ties and a well organized machine. This year may be different given the match of dollars from Obama and Edwards and the sheer number of contributors. Does that mean that either can match her organization though? Great story Ted. This is shaping up to what could be a really interesting primary race. The big question for me is whether Clinton has lined up support within typical Democratic primary leaders and, thereby, voters in these states? Does she have the party’s so called “Super Delegates” if those still exist at the convention? Is her support “soft”?

In the past I have been excited by fresh new candidates like an Obama, a Richardson, or an Edwards (not all that new…but no Clinton in terms of ties) only to see them get run over by a train built of established ties and a well organized machine.

This year may be different given the match of dollars from Obama and Edwards and the sheer number of contributors. Does that mean that either can match her organization though?

]]>