Friday, December 1st, 2006...6:39 am

Chairman Follies: the Democrats

Jump to Comments

As much fun as I’ve had poking at the Republicans, there is a race for Party Chair on our side too.

The last two years have seen three, yes three, State Democratic Party Chairs. Jim Pederson resigned to run for US Senate, his replacement Harry Mitchell resigned to run for US House. Mitchell was replaced with the novel choice of the Executive Director, David Waid. Waid hasn’t said either way if he will run this time around.

Despite extensive lists of dream candidates (and here too), there seems to be only two actual candidates who are running. Party activist and teacher Randy Camacho has already earned the support of and (although not, as was rumored, the support of Terry Goddard, who has remained neutral so far). Camacho is a former congressional candidate, running against twice. There are some concerns about his fundraising ability. He did, however, raise $46,296 in his first race and $93,253 in his second. I am impressed with the second number, which isn’t bad considering that he was running uphill the entire time. These aren’t the numbers that one can run the state party on, but he at least seems to know something about making the money calls.

His probable opponent is Jeff Latas. Latas, for those of you that haven’t paid enough attention to this blog, ran in the CD 8 Democratic primary as an alternative to the left of Patty Weiss and eventual nominee and Congresswoman-elect Gabrielle Giffords. Latas’s supporters were rumored to be attempting a take over of some Pima County district clubs as a show of muscle flexing, but aside from District 26, it hasn’t been as successful as they probably would have liked. He does, however, have the support of the Sonora Progressive Democrats, many of whom are on the state committee.

I’m still a bit unclear on what the Latas supporters think he can accomplish as chair. In this recent election cycle, the Democratic nominees for Governor and Attorney General put up impressive wins, we won two US House seats, and gains were made in the State House and Senate. Before anyone says that this was going to happen anyway, remember that political pros were saying two years ago that Napolitano was a one term fluke, early this year Republicans were salivating about a possible 2/3 majority House and Senate, and it took some foresight to see that a decent candidate could be recruited to take out . Exactly what part of this does Latas think was a failure? What would he have done differently to make it possible for, I dunno, Janet Napolitano to get 70% or for Phil Lopes to have another couple of caucus members?

What I do hear is the phrase “holding our elected officials accountable.” I think we can do that as citizens every election at the ballot box, or even as activists when we decide who we will support. I have big problems with party committees doing this except in the most limited of circumstances. If the folks throwing this phrase around mean having the party enforce loyalty oaths or passing resolutions to condemn our elected officials, I’d rather not have any part of it. What this sounds like is those hard right Republican clubs in Phoenix that pass anti- resolutions: McCain just blows it off, and the activists just look like buffoons.

I am also wondering if Latas is over estimating his support in Phoenix. The lion’s share of the votes will come from the greater Phoenix area, where he doesn’t have the same level of grass roots support as he has here. I’m wondering if Latas’s “I’ve been an insurgent that wasn’t afraid to take on a popular Republican” mantle can also be claimed by Camacho, who would be much better known to the Phoenix activists.

A big question in this race is who will Napolitano throw her weight behind. Traditionally, if the state has a Democratic governor, the Governor will all but pick the State Chair. There is some worry from the Governor’s camp about Latas, and some constrenation in other quarters that the early backing of Camacho by Grijalva and Pastor (which was done without talking to the Governor) may indicate some split among our Democratic College of Cardinals. I’ve asked a couple of people “Who is the governor backing then?” and no one seems to have an answer.

State committee meeting on Saturday, we’ll see what’s up. Trouble is, everyone knows me now and stops even whispering when I’m around.

NB - All this talk about Randy Camacho, what about Juan Camacho? The meetings would certainly be more lively.

10 Comments

  • You said:

    “I am also wondering if Latas is over estimating his support in Phoenix.”

    Not to snark, but I wonder if Latas is overestimating his support down south as well. It’s not like his grassroots lit the sky on fire during the primary.

    Latas sounds like the only way he can run is to run angry. Not sure if that is the ticket to the state chairmanship at this point.

  • You forgot Carter Olson who is running from Pinal and there are a lot of folks trying to draft Alexis Tameron, young democrat, to run.

  • Up north we’re holding out for the return of Jim Pederson. Everybody else is just a pretender to The Chair.

  • Yeayyy I vote for the Macho Camacho!!

  • I am for Camacho! Enthusiastically.

  • The Governor sent out letters during the last several weeks talking about the accomplishments of the Arizona Democrats AND giving special recognition to David Waid and the coordinated campaign. She obviously views him very positively…..

  • “political pros were saying 2 years ago that Napolitano was a 1 term fluke …” What political pros — Republicans?? Eleven months ago Janet was a shoe-in and the Repugs were consulting Dex !

    As far as “special recognition (from the Gov) to David Waid”, she gave special recognition to Michael Frais also and the only recognition either really deserve is blowing the Coordinated Campaign to pad Janet’s margin.

    Word is Frias is looking for a new job after knocking down $120K to destroy the Coordinated Campaign, Hopefully, he’ll find it in another undeserving state.

  • Let me see if I understand this: Jeff Latas, who did not express his support for the winner of the primary in AZ 8, which he did not win (sounds better than to say he lost) now wants to be State chair. I always thought the State chair supported Democratic candidates - no?

  • I would support Carter Olson or Jim Pederson. problem is that Jim is not running and has told multiple people that exact thing MULTIPLE TIMES. He’s done. He got burned by the Governor , burned by the state party and burned by Arizona Democrats.

  • You mean the same Jim Pederson that didn’t place any “Democrat” label on any of his signs or advertising. “Nobody’s senator but yours?”

    I would have thought that Democratic support would have brought him down judging by the campaign he ran. Hard to blame the state Democrats for his failure, they seemed to pull through for almost everyone else.

Leave a Reply

Add to Technorati Favorites hidden hit counter